電腦支援問答競爭學習遊戲設計之探索

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：6

、訪客IP：3.149.251.155

姓名

王千濤(Chin-tau Wang ) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程研究所

論文名稱

電腦支援問答競爭學習遊戲設計之探索
(Exploring the Design of Computer Supported Question-and-Answering Competitions Exercise Game)

相關論文

★ 一個適用於解題領域的模擬多重學習同伴之方法	★ 亞卓市全民學校系統設計與初步使用成果
★ 網路學習資訊護照系統	★ 全民學校之團隊教學與團隊學習設計
★ 亞卓期刊系統之設計與實作	★ 網路上目標設定環境的建置網路上目標設定環境的建置以閱讀網站為例
★ 亞卓合作觀察實驗站之研究	★ 使用 EduClick 當作遠端遙控互動評量系統
★ 出題與同儕評題支援系統之設計及評估	★ 支援不同解題練習遊戲活動之雙人學習系統
★ 亞卓市多重學習系統之黏合機制	★ 激發使用動機之網路個人學習平台
★ 一個設計結構化網路學習社群之方法	★ 線上社群系統上可客製化機制之設計與實作
★ 無線環境下支援高互動學習之通訊伺服器設計	★ 行動電腦教室與其管理系統的設計與建置

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

許多研究者認為，競爭式的學習活動可以增加學習者的學習動機及學習成效。但也有研究者指出，在競爭活動的過程中，可能會對學習者產生負面的影響。在此為了要降低競爭學習活動對學習者的負面影響，所以作者採用”遊戲”的方式進行競爭活動。本研究發展了一套名為”Joyce”的系統。Joyce是一個以問答練習遊戲為主體的練習環境，學習者(們)可以在其中進行遊戲比賽。本研究想探討學習者對於三項變因的反應，三項的變因如下：1)競爭者為電腦模擬的代理人、單一位學習者或是一個團體。2)是否與競爭對手面對面。3)競爭強度不同的答題模式。由於這些變因使得本研究發展出的練習環境中有八種競爭模式及兩種答題模式。實驗結果發現：1)大部分的學習者較喜歡用競爭程度較強的方式來進行遊戲。2)比較傾向於自己一個人一組，能夠主導遊戲的進行而不受其他人的干擾。3)學習者覺得與對手面對面會使遊戲更有趣。4)非面對面競爭可以較專心思考問題，不受到競爭對手的干擾。大部分的學習者認為5)利用Joyce進行問答練習可以增強自己的學科能力。6)Joyce能激起學習興趣。7)有半數的受測者認為Joyce練習環境能讓他們感到輕鬆自在、不會有太大的壓力。8)有7成多的學習者能針對同一道題目，第一次答錯而第二次能答對。

摘要(英)

Many researchers consider that the competitive activities can increase the learners’ learning motivation and performance. But there are some researchers think that it may have some bad influence during the competitive process. In order to reduce the bad effect of competition, we proceed the activities with the game style. In this study, the researchers developed a system named “Joyce”. Joyce is a learning environment, which is a Question-and-Answering game with the style of board games, and learners could compete with other learners in it. The researchers want to explore the learners’ reactions about the factors. 1) The different kinds of competitors. 2) The competition with face-to-fact or via Internet. 3) The different answering modes. Therefore, there are eight kinds of competition modes and two kinds of answering modes in the learning environment. We discover that most of learners prefer to play games with the strong answering mode and they tend to play the game alone and control the progress of the game completely. Besides, learners feel that the game is more interesting if the competition is face-to-face. The learners can answer the question with stronger attention when they can’t see each other. The learners can enhance their knowledge of the subjects by playing the game and increase their interests of learning. Half of learners feel relaxed when playing Joyce and more than 70% of learners can answer the same questions correctly which they answered wrongly before.

關鍵字(中)

★ 教育代理人
★ 棋盤式問答遊戲
★ 競爭模式

關鍵字(英)

★ Competition mode
★ Education agent
★ Question-and-Answering board game

論文目次

第一章、簡介1
1.1研究背景1
1.2動機與目的6
1.3相關研究7
1.4相關理論10
1.4.1競爭10
1.4.2遊戲11
第二章、活動設計14
2.1練習環境設計14
2.1.1代理人設計16
2.1.2遊戲規則設計18
2.2八種競爭模式及其應用環境22
2.2.1單機上的競爭模式24
2.2.2透過網路進行的競爭模式26
2.3兩種答題模式27
第三章、系統架構及系統實作29
3.1系統架構31
3.2系統實作37
3.2.1系統概況描述37
3.2.2多人組隊答題設計38
3.2.3高負載設計41
3.2.4答題機制設計44
3.2.5練習題庫編輯系統52
第四章、初步實驗結果與討論61
4.1實驗一61
4.1.1實驗內容61
4.1.2資料分析63
4.1.3實驗結果討論63
4.2實驗二65
4.2.1實驗內容65
4.2.2資料分析67
4.2.3實驗結果討論70
4.3學習者答題歷程分析71
第五章、總結與未來工作73
參考文獻76
附錄79

參考文獻

[1]王景聰, 張立杰, 許秉瑜與陳德懷(1999). :網路上一個供使用者教育代理人-教育電子雞, Proceedings of Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, 174-181.
[2]何榮桂和賴志宏. (1997): 區域網路環境中之競爭式電腦輔助教學. 第六屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集, 272-280.
[3]張立杰, 王千濤與陳德懷(2000). :選擇題問答遊戲中電腦同伴答題反應的設計方法, Proceedings of Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education, 900-907.
[4]Bossert, S.T. (1989). Cooperative activities in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 15, 225-250.
[5]Burton, R. R. and John Seely Brown. (1979): An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, Vol. 11, 5-24.
[6]Chan T. W. (1991): Integration-Kid: A Learning Companion System. The 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., 1094-1099.
[7]Chan T.W. and Baskin A. B. (1988): Studying with the Prince: The computer as a learning Companion. International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, June, Montreal, Canada, 194-200.
[8]Chan, T.W. and Baskin, A.B. (1990). : “Learning Companion Systems”. IN: Intelligent Tutoring System: At the Crossroad of AI and Education. Chapter 1,Norwood, NJ: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.
[9]Chan, T. W., Chung, I. L., Ho, R. G., Hou, W. J. and Lin, G. L. (1990). : Distributed Learning Companion System: WEST Revisited. The 2nd International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring System, C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & G. McCalla(Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 608, Spring-Verlag, 643-650.
[10]Davis, G., and Rimm, S. (1985): Education of the gifted and talented. Englwwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[11]Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1985): Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York:lenum.
[12]Dugdale, S., and Kibbey, D. (1997). : Elementary mathematics with PLATO. Computer-based Education Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana.
[13]Fan, F. L., Chen, J. H., Hsia, Y. T., Chang, L. J. and Chan, T. W. (1997). : A WWW-Based Competitive Game System for Learning. The 7th International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction, 485-492.
[14]Johnson, D., and Johnson, R. (1975): Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[15]Julian, J., and Perry, F. (1967). Cooperation contrasted with intra-group and inter-group competition. Sociometry, 30, 79-90.
[16]Kohn, A. (1992). No Contest: the case against competition. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Co.
[17]Liang, J. K., Wang, H. Y., Huang, C. W., Chang, S. B. and Chan, T. W. (2001). : Highly Interactive Instruction Environment for Classroom - Integration of Wireless Testing System and Learning Information Management System, Proceedings of CAL 2001. To be printed.
[18]Malone, T. W., and Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow, R. E. and Farr, M. J. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Cognitive and Affective Process Analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[19]Marc Prensky. (2001): Digital Game-Based Learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[20]P. Dillenbourg and J. Self. (1991): Designing Human-Computer Collaborative Learning. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Human-Computer Collaborative Learning, Springer-Verlag.
[21]P. Dillenbourg and J. Self. (1992): PEOPLE POWER: A Human-Computer Collaborative Learning System. Second International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring System, June, Montreal, Canada, 651-660.
[22]Rich, D. (1992): Mega skills. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
[23]Weinberg, R., and Jackson, A. (1979): Competition and extrinsic rewards: effect on intrinsic motivation and attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 649-657.
[24]Whittemore, I. C. (1924). The influence of competition on performance: an experimental study. Journal of Abnormal and social Psychology, 19, 236-253.

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan)

審核日期

2001-7-11

推文